The Common Core State Standards were adopted in August of 2010. NS curriculum teams have worked over the years to understand the standards and the impact of the standards on teaching and learning. As part of the next steps we are going to begin a Reading Program adoption for English Language Arts.
When the CC ELA standards were first adopted, the curriculum companies were way behind in providing materials that were high quality and they were loosely aligned at best. As time has passed, curricular materials are now available that are tightly aligned to the standards and best practices in instruction.
Quality Instructional Materials are incredibly important. High-quality instructional materials are designed to help build a teacher’s content knowledge, provide guidance to inform lesson planning and offer structures to support collaboration with other teachers. Research shows that students gain months of learning when teachers use high-quality instructional materials. The average middle school student using aligned math textbooks gains about 8 months of additional learning compared with a student using unaligned materials (Kane & Owens, 2016). A 2013 quasi-experimental study from Mathematica conducted in five high-poverty Expeditionary Learning schools in Washington, D.C. and New York City found positive academic effects in both reading and math – and the positive impacts increased the longer the school used the materials (Expeditionary Learning is a highly standards-aligned curriculum).
The general process that we will follow to evaluate reading programs is: